Hi Ewan,
If I understand it correctly you want to perform Reverse geocoding right?
Hi Eric,
Can you attach a small sample?
TIA
Hi Eric,
You are right, a lot of people don’t know about the GitHub repositories. We mention it on blogs and replies on this forum. I think we should make a specific blog just about it.
Besides Wisej-Extensions repository, there is also a Wisej-Examples repository. The later includes examples not found on https://wisej.com/examples/ As you can imagine, publishing on GitHub is a very “agile” experience, and that makes a lot easier to add enhancements or fix the example projects.
Hi Eric,
We will fix the download. Meanwhile you can access the souce code at GitHub Wisej-Extensions repository.
[Edit]
The download date is indeed Feb 14, 2018 – 10:20 am but the code is correct as the above fix is already there.
Hi,
The feature
is an enabler for the other features: it just provides support for async/await programing.
In a nutshell, these features mean you can call a JavaScript function that runs on the browser and get the server side to continue execution when the result arrives. You can get the result using either a callback or async/await programing. It’s your choice.
Before this change, your JavaScript code had to implement the callback by itself, by calling a server side [WebMethod] to return the result. Now the JavaScipt function just has to return 123; and 123 is received on the server side, on the callback method or as an await result.
Using async/await programing isn’t very common in WinForms and it can be used in very different situations.
An example is on the making to show how to use both features.
Hi Ewan,
All static (in C#) / Shared (in VB.NET) variables (or properties) are global, meaning all instances (all sessions) have access, according to the variable’s visibility. For instance
static int SharedCounter = 0;
static int SharedCounterProperty {get; set;}
are the shared among all sessions. If you set the value on one session, the others will get the same value.
If you want a static variable that isn’t shared, you must use the Session object
Hi Cristian,
this problem is resolved in development build 1.5.9.
Best regards
Frank
Hi Washington, Tim,
we just released development build 1.5.9 which should fix these issues.
Best regards
Frank
Hi,
This is the one area that concerns me.
We, & I imagine many others, will be writing customer apps. mostly for local / LAN use, which means a new server license for every customer.
If we have to charge the customer then that means we have to provide premium support, whereas we normally offer software for free.
I would prefer a one off (higher) cost & them go royalty free.
I need to make an inquiry to see what kind of offers are available.
Hi Norm,
Did you try to set the DataGridView’s EditMode to Wisej.Web.DataGridViewEditMode.EditOnEnter?
The ComboBox arrow show as soon as you click the comboBox, no need to double click.
I’m now trying to follow the steps in this post: https://wisej.com/support/question/hi-something-like-particle-js
I just cant seem to get wavesurfer to behave.
Also upgraded to 1.5.7 and the dropdowns for the grid do not work anymore. You can look at this sample on this page and you can’t get the dropdown to show.
https://wisej.com/support/question/combobox-dropdownstyle-in-datagridview-is-not-saved.
We had to roll back to 1.5.6
Thanks -Tim
Also upgraded to 1.5.7 and the dropdowns for the grid do not work anymore. You can look at this sample on this page and you can’t get the dropdown to show.
https://wisej.com/support/question/combobox-dropdownstyle-in-datagridview-is-not-saved
Thanks -Tim
Hi Washington,
We could reproduce it. Logged as WJ-9085. Will be solved in the next release.
Hi John,
Can you send a small sample so we can reproduce the problem? Thanks.
1.5.6.0
Hi Norm,
[Edit]
[Previous content deleted.]
What Wisej version are you running?
Hi Cristian,
We could reproduce it. Logged as WJ-9085
Hi,
this is the test case, to run with wisej 1.5.7 development.
please ignore the last row comment, the width was a problem of my Visual Studio, the real problem is only that the cells are not editable
regards
Cristian
Hi Cristian,
can you please provide a test case for the problem you have been observing with 1.5.7 ?
Thanks in advance.
Best regards
Frank
